Charleston: questions instead of commentary

  1. When a crazy guy goes on a shooting rampage — even when clearly motivated by hate — must there necessarily be a “big picture” conclusion to be drawn? Whatever happened to the default lone wolf explanation?  What was the “big picture” narrative following this crazy (black) guy’s shooting (a bunch of whites)? Does anyone even remember that?
  2. Is it possible for a crazy killer to have legitimate grievances? Was polite society this squeamish about such “root causes” following 9/11?
  3. What do the status signallers who call for purging the Confederate flag plan to do about their communist kitsch?
  4. What sort of jackshit would Jon Stewart like us to do, precisely?
  5. Has National Review momentarily grown a pair?

3 thoughts on “Charleston: questions instead of commentary

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s